From: FutureT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 09:19:17 EDT
Subject: Re: [TSSP] Topload breakout potentials
--part1_cd.17680b54.2a0fc5d5_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/11/02 6:32:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk writes: > How can we determine whether Marc's and John's primaries are > really tuned low, or whether the model is just not representing > them properly? > > Tuning low seems to keep quite a lot of energy in the primary, > thus reducing the peak topvolts but perhaps enabling the beat > envelope to be sustained over more beats, thus generating > fewer streamers but allowing them to grow longer. Is this a > recommended way to deal with a too-small topload? > > -- > Paul Nicholson, > --part1_cd.17680b54.2a0fc5d5_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/11/02 6:32:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk writes:
How can we determine whether Marc's and John's primaries are
really tuned low, or whether the model is just not representing
them properly?
Tuning low seems to keep quite a lot of energy in the primary,
thus reducing the peak topvolts but perhaps enabling the beat
envelope to be sustained over more beats, thus generating
fewer streamers but allowing them to grow longer. Is this a
recommended way to deal with a too-small topload?
--
Paul Nicholson,
--part1_cd.17680b54.2a0fc5d5_boundary--
Maintainer Paul Nicholson, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk.