TSSP: List Archives

From: FutureT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 18:34:31 EDT
Subject: Re: [TSSP] Topload breakout potentials


--part1_74.1ccdb12c.2a119977_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 5/12/02 7:37:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
tesla123@pacbell.net writes:


> I doubt it. 14kV/cm just seems to low for the surface to ionize. I
> suspect I am seeing a higher voltage at the cap upon conduction. I
> suspect I can check this with a simple static gap? Maybe using identical
> 1" brass sphere's, I could run it a few seconds and see if it will run at
> 120bps in this mode. Setting the sphere gap to 0.5" should require an arc
> voltage of ~28kV to arc across. Assuming I leave the ballast variac at
> it's SRSG position (same current), I could begin decreasing distance
> until I get breakover. The arc voltage should be able to be back calc'd
> from the distance.
> 
> Take care,
> Bart
> 
> Bart,

I think such tests are very worthwhile.  I used that method to
check my HV probe calibration, and it seemed to agree very
well.  

cheers,
John

--part1_74.1ccdb12c.2a119977_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 5/12/02 7:37:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla123@pacbell.net writes:


I doubt it. 14kV/cm just seems to low for the surface to ionize. I
suspect I am seeing a higher voltage at the cap upon conduction. I
suspect I can check this with a simple static gap? Maybe using identical
1" brass sphere's, I could run it a few seconds and see if it will run at
120bps in this mode. Setting the sphere gap to 0.5" should require an arc
voltage of ~28kV to arc across. Assuming I leave the ballast variac at
it's SRSG position (same current), I could begin decreasing distance
until I get breakover. The arc voltage should be able to be back calc'd
from the distance.

Take care,
Bart

Bart,

I think such tests are very worthwhile.  I used that method to
check my HV probe calibration, and it seemed to agree very
well. 

cheers,
John
--part1_74.1ccdb12c.2a119977_boundary--
Maintainer Paul Nicholson, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk.