From: FutureT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 18:47:29 EDT
Subject: Re: [TSSP] Topload breakout potentials
--part1_8f.1bf4f704.2a119c81_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/12/02 2:47:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk writes: > which ought to hold back the breakout for longer. The only trouble > is that the primary probably won't tune this low. I'm not sure how > many more turns you have beyond 14.5, but you'd need around 40% more > primary inductance. Whether the secondary would also take the extra > 490kV/380kV = 30% higher voltage gradient is a further question. > Paul , all, I have about 21 turns total, so I should have enough. Maybe I'll try the 6" x 24" toroid and see what happens. Cheers, John --part1_8f.1bf4f704.2a119c81_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/12/02 2:47:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk writes:
which ought to hold back the breakout for longer. The only trouble
is that the primary probably won't tune this low. I'm not sure how
many more turns you have beyond 14.5, but you'd need around 40% more
primary inductance. Whether the secondary would also take the extra
490kV/380kV = 30% higher voltage gradient is a further question.
Paul , all,
I have about 21 turns total, so I should have enough. Maybe I'll
try the 6" x 24" toroid and see what happens.
Cheers,
John --part1_8f.1bf4f704.2a119c81_boundary--
Maintainer Paul Nicholson, paul@abelian.demon.co.uk.